Showing posts with label Marvel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marvel. Show all posts

Sunday, January 24, 2021

WandaVision Episode 1 - "Filmed Before a Live Audience"


Hey, guys, It's After Hours Media here. We have the first two episodes of WandaVision, and in traditional After Hours Media fashion, I am a week or so late, haha. WandaVision is the first Marvel Studios show. Starring Elizabeth Olsen and Paul Bettany as Wanda Maximoff (The Scarlet Witch) and The Vision, on a $225 million budget. The synopsis is: after the events of Avengers: Endgame, Wanda and Vision live the idyllic suburban life in the town of Westview, trying to conceal their powers. As they begin to enter new decades and encounter television tropes, the couple suspects that things may not be what they seem.
 
Kevin Feige describes the show as:
 
"if you haven't seen any of [the M.C.U. films] and just want to step into this weird thing because you love The Dick Van Dyke Show, it's going to work. But if you've been tracking the 23 movies we've made and following along the stories into Phase 4, there'll be a wealth of rewards waiting for you as it all unfolds [1]."

Opening


The first episode of WandaVision starts with a slightly altered Fanfare; as each character appears on the screen, they quickly fade off to black and white. It transitions and zooms out of the "Marvel Studios" logo with updated scenes from Infinity War and Endgame; the whole logo turns black and white, the audio switches from stereo to mono, and the aspect ratio morphs into 4:3 representing the shift to the 1950s.
 
To get into the spirit of the show, crew members came to set in '50s-era clothing. And for the authentic 1950s sitcom look, they used period-accurate lenses and lighting to capture that dreamy vintage glow [1]. Some behind-the-scenes footage shows what seems to be colour footage shot, but later in the video, multiple black and white monitors, as they filmed [2]. When films have a specific colour grade in mind, monitors will use a L.U.T. (Look Up Table) to get a rough idea during production. It's uncertain if they shot the show in black and white, or the monitors got set to black and white.

The show then starts with 1950s sitcom-inspired opening credits - possibly taking inspiration from The Dick Van Dyke Show. The Dick Van Dyke Show served as one of many shows that inspired WandaVision - so far as to parallel the first episode of The Dick Van Dyke Show starting in the kitchen and leading to a dinner party with the Boss.

WandaVision Title (Marvel Studios) / The Dick Van Dyke Show (C.B.S.)

During Disney's 2019 D23 Expo, Kevin Feige and Director, Matt Shakman, invited Dick Van Dyke to lunch at Disneyland, peppering him with questions about producing the show. Shakman on meeting the comedy legend:

"That remains one of the great afternoons of my life. [The Dick Van Dyke Show] can be very broad with silly physical-comedy gags, and yet it never feels false, and I wondered how they did that. We asked him, 'What was the sort of governing principle behind the Dick Van Dyke Show? Why did it work so well?' And he said if it couldn't happen in real life, it can't happen on the show. If you're drawing something that's grounded and it's real, and it's resonating with everyone's experience at home, you can do crazy things [1, 3]."
 

The Kitchen


Continuing with the show, Wanda's opening line of dialogue is very interesting: "My husband and his indestructible head." Considering the outcome of Avengers: Infinity War, Vision doesn't have an indestructible head. But when Wanda had to destroy the Mind Stone, it took ages, to which Thanos reversed time and broke his head quickly. I'm sure Wanda wished Vizh had an indestructible head! I don't know if Vision's line, "My wife and her flying saucers" is a reference to anything. I think saying it's a reference to S.W.O.R.D. (more on that in a sec!) is pushing it. Wanda's hometown, Sokovia, did fly up in the air and many Ultron bots were flying everywhere. To me, that does sound plausible; I'd like to know if you think it is down below!Speaking of saucers, the special-effects team used wires and camera tricks straight from "Bewitched" or "I Dream of Jeannie," to make wine bottles appear to pour on their own, and household appliances zoom about like magic. The crew members even came to set in '50s-era clothing and used period-accurate lenses and lighting to capture that dreamy vintage glow. And when Vision's familiar maroon skin didn't look quite right in grayscale, the makeup artists painted Bettany blue instead - which would have been interesting to see! [1]

Mystery Calendar Date


Next Vision draws attention to the calendar with the date August 23rd marked on it, neither he nor Wanda can remember why it's there; which could be referencing the fact, Wanda and Vision have lost their memory in the comics.

The date is something to point out. There's no year, but the only 23rd that falls on a Wednesday in that era was 1961. Nothing of importance really lands on this date, but it is the same day the first American "space platform", Ranger 1, was launched into orbit, which failed, resulting in it crashing a week later. Some could consider this event a flying saucer, but I think it's a little too obscure to be what Vision's line was referencing. If we look at more recent years, August 23rd falls on a Wednesday in 2023, which would line up with the M.C.U.'s current timeline. Considering the first episode is modelled on the Dick Van Dyke Show set in the 50s and not the 60s, I'd say it's 2023.

The date is more likely referencing "Avengers #238: Unlimited Vision (1983) [4]," featuring Monica Rambeau as Captain Marvel. In this issue, a computer named I.S.A.A.C. revives an incapacitated Vision, in which he merges, and learns to project holograms. In a previous connected-issue - "Avengers #233: The Annihilation Gambit! (1983) [5]" - Annihilus hinders Vision when he tries to breach a Null-Field bubble surrounding the Baxter Building. The bubble aspect seems reminiscent of what Wanda is doing to people who try to breach her alternate reality. The calendar date may foreshadow Visions return from an advanced computer, or Visions revival in general.
 
The Avengers #238 / The Avengers #233 (Marvel Comics)

Who Is Agnes?


As Vision leaves for work and Wanda pondering, we hear a knock at the door. I tried to see if the knocking was Morse Code, but my translation was gibberish - though, I'm not great, so I could have got it wrong.

Wanda then answers the door to a new character, played by Kathryn Hahn - Agnes - the prototypical nosey neighbour peering over fences or barging in without knocking. Part Ethel Mertz from "I Love Lucy," part Gladys Kravitz from "Bewitched." Hahn describes Agnes as "the next-door neighbour that won't get off their couch at the end of the night," and "the one that's just going to be always in your business [6]."

When Wanda introduces herself, Agnes replies with "charmed," in an interesting tone, almost as if she knows Wanda's magic. It could be a stretch, but maybe it's also a reference to the late '90s show Charmed.

WandaVision plays on the "unseen partner" trope from many sitcoms that has had many people cooking up theories and asking "who is Ralph?" He may never get revealed on the show to play into that trope, but it would be interesting to reveal Ralph at the end to be the complete opposite of what everyone was expecting.

Agnes' Broach And Comic Connections


Agnes wears a peculiar broach in the centre of her collar invoking Agatha Harkness-like look; the name "Agnes" most likely is a shortening to misdirect people. Ag-atha Hark-ness. But that hasn't stopped us from potentially figuring it out!

Agatha Harkness first appeared in "Fantastic Four #94 (1970) [7]" as the Governess to be caretaker of Reed Richards and Sue Storm's son, Franklin. "Fantastic Four #186 (1977) [8]" further explored Agatha's backstory: she is over 10,000-years-old, and at some point in her past joined the colony in New Salem - the surviving witches and wizards from the Salem Trials. Agnes' anniversary with Ralph - June 2nd - directly connects to the Salem Trials that started with Bridget Bishop's accusation of the first person to practice witchcraft on June 2nd, 1692.

Fantastic Four #39 / Fantastic Four #186 (Marvel Comics)

Agatha became a mentor-like figure to Scarlet Witch in "The Vision & The Scarlet Witch Vol. 2 (1985 - 1986) [9]" series. When she seemingly died in that run, Scarlet Witch absorbed some of her magical energies, manifesting Agatha's astral form that guided her to create children for Vision and herself [10]. Years later new Editor-In-Cheif, Tom DeFalco, had the children recontextualized to Soul Fragments of The Devil, Mephisto leading Agatha to wipe the trauma from Wanda's mind in "Avengers: West Coast #52 (1989) [11]."

Wanda later discovered what happened, having a mental breakdown killed Agatha for good [12]. Wanda alters reality during this mental breakdown so much The Avengers and X-men team up to kill her. Before they can, a flash happens, and they're in an alternate reality where the Mutants are the dominant species, Magneto rules the world, and everyone's greatest wish came true. This storyline called "House Of M" ends with Wanda altering reality yet again saying "No more Mutants." Everyone wakes up with their memories from the House Of M reality, back in their original universe, but Wanda decimated the Mutants with barely any left [13].

The Vision & The Scarlet Witch Vol. 2 #3 / Avengers: West Coast #52 / Avengers: Disassembled #503 / House Of M T.P.B. (Marvel Comics)

If WandaVision takes any inspiration from these comics, things could get very crazy. So far, Wanda has brought Vision back and will give herself children, which both happened in the House Of M storyline. The next step is Wanda losing her mind and creating a world of Mutants.

Vision's Work - Computational Service inc.


WandaVision also plays into the trope of a character working somewhere, but no one actually knows what they do - usually the audience. The show has it's own little satirical twist on it with Vision being a machine and always looking for logic, asking "what it is we do here exactly?" But also in a way, seeing through the illusion of this fake reality that surrounds him. Trailers even hint at Vision seeing through this illusion of reality, suggesting that Vision is alive, not just a fake explicitly created for this reality.
 
I like the word-play in the series about Visions robotic nature - "you're like a walking computer," "have you got a screw loose," "screws all tightened, sir," and "I don't have a skeleton, sir." We could see the last quote in two ways: "I don't have a skeleton, sir," as, literally, not having a skeleton. Or not having the backbone to stand up to his Boss - taken this way, Mr Hart's reply of "glad to hear it. Your future in this company depends on it," is in-line with that off bosses who treat their employees horribly.

Wanda And Agnes At home


We then return home to Wanda and Agnes reading a "Glamourours" magazine, a play on Glamour Magazine, followed by a call from Vision with the classic situation where characters have a conversation about two completely different topics thinking it's the same one. To which this one leads to an interesting greeting at the dinner party later.
 
Glamourours Magazine (Marvel Studios) / Glamour Magazine (Condé Nast)

Toaster Commercial


I love the old-school commercials they do in this show. The "Toast Mate 2000" is such a classic cliche 60s name! It's also interesting to note that Stark Industries made it, and if you listen when they turn the toaster on, it makes the sound of Tony Starks Repulsor Tech (R.T.). Yet, another reference to the outside world. And notice when the camera is in a close-up, the light turns red - our first splash of colour in the show. The toaster beeping faster and faster, maybe mirroring Wanda's backstory from Avengers: Age Of Ultron when her and Pietro as children were stuck waiting for a Stark missile to explode and kill them after it hit their apartment.

When "Commercial Man," Ithamar Enriquez got interviewed by Eric Voss of New Rockstars - Eric asked Ithamar about that very theory. Enriquez replied, "I don't know if I can answer that without giving too much away [14]," lending credence to the theory. Hints of Wanda's memory are making their way into this fictional reality in peculiar ways. Elizabeth Olsen described the show as "a coming of age story. For her, it's more of a coming of woman age story. Like, she [she] start[s] to come to terms with [her] past, and who [she is], and take accountability for things, and kind of coming to terms with [her]self [15]." So, aspects of her past coming back into play would make complete sense if she has come to terms with them and grow as a character.

Behind Commercial Man and Commercial Woman - Ithamar Enriquez and Victoria Blade - the clock on the wall is missing the number six. As the show goes on, six becomes a recurring number, but I'll talk more about that in my WandaVision Episode 2 article.

There's also something sinister about the tagline at the end - "Forget the past; this is your future!" Whether this is a reference to Wanda controlling everyone in this bubble reality, or someone manipulating Wanda subconsciously planting these messages everywhere - I'm not sure. But, every single detail seems to mean something in WandaVision!

The Dinner


The show moves on to Vision bringing Mr and Mrs Hart home for dinner, and Wanda has set the mood for her and Vision to get it on, continuing that trope from the phonecall earlier. Mr Hart drops another play on words with his, "you blow a fuse?"
 
Wanda surprises Mr Hart with the "traditional Sokovian greeting of hospitality," as Vizh turns on the light and Mr Hart asks "what is the meaning of this?" creating the stereotypical situation where they need to dig themselves out of a hole. Vision digs them out explaining Wanda is Sokovian, which Mrs Hart finds exotic, but Mr Hart says "we don't break bread with Bolsheviks," referencing the Cold War since we are in the '50s.
 
Mrs Hart comments on the nightgown Wanda is wearing, which looks like a nod to the gown Laura has in an episode of The Dick Van Dyke Show - Never Bathe on Saturday.
 
Wanda's Dress (Marvel Studios) / Laura's Dress (C.B.S.)

Wanda snaps her fingers, shifting into gear, and with Agnes' help, Wanda tries to pull together dinner using her telekinetic powers while Vision distracts Mr and Mrs Hart. Agnes mentions "this menu can be done in a snap," further leading us to think Agnes knows more than she's letting on.

Mr Hart explains changes he wants to do at work, as a confused Vision inquires about these changes and Hart replies with "you're awfully dense, aren't you, Vision?" referencing the fact Vision can control the density of his body.

As Wanda whips together a quick dinner - or breakfast, the same breakfast she spoke about at the start of the episode - Mr Hart sternly talks to Vision about him and his wife being hungry and that there is chaos going on all around him. Often Wanda's powers are referred to as Chaos Magic, so there technically is chaos going on around all of them.
 
Wanda sets the table with a bottle of wine called "Maiso Du Mepris." Translated from French, it says "house of contempt." Contempt is reasonably close to misery, so it's safe to say this refers to the House Of M storyline.

As they sit down to eat, the Harts ask Wanda and Vision their story, but when they cannot explain where they came from, Mr Hart grows furious and begins choking on his food. At this point, the sitcom format briefly subsides, turning into an episode of The Twilight Zone, as Mrs Hart creepily continues to ask her husband to "stop it" with deliberate close-ups of the reactions of each character. Vision saves Mr Hart and everything returns to "normal," and not a mention of what happened. Such a bizarre and creepy part of the episode; almost as if Wanda subconsciously did it to Mr Hart, hinting at Wanda's potential grip on reality loosening.

The Ending


I love the classic jump-cut when Wanda creates rings for Vision and herself - it reminds me of I Dream of Jeannie or Bewitched. The WandaVision show then ends with a hexagonal shaped frame - that number six coming back again - while fake credits roll. In these credits, names like Babs Digby, Abe Brown, Leonard Hooper, Pamela Brewster, Sammy Addison, Miriam Norton, Felix Rizzo, Cathy Collins, and Deila Kane appear.
 
In a show like this, throwing references into fake credits is the perfect opportunity - and these go deep. Babs Digby refers to a 1940s radio show, The Life Of Riley, featuring two characters named, Digby "Digger" O'Dell and Barbara "Babs" Riley [16]. The Life Of Riley is a strange inclusion - considering it had a radio show and feature film in the 40s and a series and comic in the 50s, it does have precedence to be there. But, here's where it gets interesting - there was also a character called Chester A. Riley whose catchphrase was, "what a revoltin' development this is!" And if you don't know, this was also a catchphrase from The Thing in Fantastic Four - he had more than just "it's clobberin' time."
 
Fantastic Four #35 / Fantastic Four #176 (Marvel Comics

The next name to appear is Abe Brown - known as Black Tiger and brother of the Prowler in the comics - he is a martial artist and has teamed up with Spider-Man, Shang-Chi, and Iron Fist [17]. What's also interesting to point out is, we have already seen him in the M.C.U. before. Abe is one of Peter's classmates at Midtown High [18].

The only connection I can find for Miriam Norton is that they wrote stories mostly for children in the 1950s [19]. The fact we know Wanda will have children might solidify this connection.

There's no real connection for Deila Kane. The best I can find is characters called Delia Childress [20] and Isabel Kane [21] in Marvel Comics. They both have affiliations to A.I.M., which might make an appearance in WandaVision (I'll talk about that in my Episode 2 article). These are very obscure characters to reference, especially Delia, as she only appears in "Marvel Team-Up Vol. 1 #102 (1981) [22]," and then accidentally killed. Neither shared a comic with Wanda or Vision; if it's not A.I.M., who knows what this is referencing if it is referencing anything.

Looking through Marvel comics, '50s T.V. shows that served as inspiration for WandaVision, and randomly Googling - I couldn't find anything for Leonard Hooper, Pamela Brewster, Sammy Addison, Felix Rizzo, and Cathy Collins. They don't seem to ring any bells at all.

The camera zooms out to what looks to be Darcy Lewis - the Political Science student from the Thor franchise - monitoring them on a Cathode Ray Television (C.R.T.). On the book and monitor to her side, we see the logo for S.W.O.R.D., the space counterpart to S.H.I.E.L.D. in the comics. I think this is an organization Nick Fury sets up himself, as we see Fury in space at the end of Spider-Man: Far From Home.

On the card released by Topps for the show, S.W.O.R.D. has a different meaning than the comics. The acronym usually means Sentient World Observation and Response Department [23], but in WandaVision, it stands for Sentient Weapon Observation Response Division [24]. I assume the change is to remove any limitations the name might suggest - not just Earth or Space, it can respond to sentient weapons anywhere.
 
S.W.O.R.D. Logo (Marvel Comics) / S.W.O.R.D. Logo (Marvel Studios)

On the left-hand monitor, you can also see what seems to be two vital signs. These could be Wanda and Vision - Red and Green - or the vitals of people they have sent into Wanda's bubble reality to try and help.

There also has to be something said about the end-credit sequence in this show. I love the abstract nature of it, and the use of the R.G.B. L.E.D.s contrasting everything. I don't usually watch the entire credits, but WandaVisions are amazing. I need to find out who created them and tell everyone about them!

End Thoughts

 
While Marvel Studios never intended WandaVision to be their first show, it seems rather fitting since it plays with everything about T.V. - from colour, aspect ratios, cinematography, tropes, writing, direction, to releasing on a week-to-week basis, and whatnot. Even the name WandaVision is excellent. Wanda's Vision - as in her love, Vision. Wanda's vision - as in how she sees everything. And WandaVision - as in us and the character's outside of Wanda's bubble reality watching the events as they unfold on a T.V. It's, literally, a T.V. show for them as well.

In an interview with ComicBookDotCom, Paul Bettany said:

"Jac Schaeffer - the writer - has written a very intricate, elegant puzzle box, and every week, fans are going to be able to peel back another layer. It is not an arbitrary decision to set it in sitcoms, that's for sure. It will all make sense. Out of all this mad, insane confusion that [you see] in the trailers - all will be explained and revealed [25]."

I love the fact that we can do this week-to-week. Yeah, it's a benefit to Marvel to stretch out content and Disney+ subscriptions - but it allows us to experience the wait we had with shows, and discuss and theorize all that week until we get the next puzzle piece.

I was initially sceptical about Showrunner Jac Schaeffer, but the writing is fantastic. Everything means something, and she managed to capture the tone of a 50s sitcom quite well, even throwing in lots of un-noticed M.C.U. references that casual audiences would miss. This show will most likely have a fantastic pay-off for the fans who picked up those references, and re-watchability for those who didn't realize them until the pay-off.

I think Wanda created this bubble reality as an escape using American sitcoms because that might be what she grew up watching as a kid in Sokovia. She believes that is the idealized American dream. It might also be why she lives in "Westview" because that's how she saw the west - as an idealized American sitcom world. And that idea plays into the title of the show perfectly.
 
Thank you for reading all of this - it was a bit much and a little bit of a tangent to get out all th information I found that I thought was so cool. If there's anything you noticed or want to correct, feel free to comment down below or Tweet me @AfterHoursMedYT!

Saturday, August 31, 2019

WHAT'S THE DISNEY/SONY SPIDER-MAN DEAL?


As we have all heard, Disney and Sony will no longer co-produce any further Spider-Man films due to an inability to renegotiate a new contract to give Disney a higher co-financing stake going forward [1].

Mike Fleming Jr - one of Sony's go-to reporters [2] - broke the story on August 20, 2019, that Spider-Man left the Marvel Cinematic Universe (M.C.U.) due to month-long negotiations breaking down, with "Disney [asking] that future Spider-Man films be a 50/50 co-financing arrangement between the studios, [as well as] discussions that this might extend to other films in the Spider-Man universe," which Sony didn't agree with [1].

Disney gaining a 50/50 co-financing arrangement would grant them a 50% stake In all Sony Spider-Man films, in which Sony houses over 900 Spider-Man associated characters. While Disney would pay half the budget for all Sony's Spider-Man related films, they would also earn 50% of the revenue for IP Sony 100% legally owns. Moving forward, this would include Venom and Morbius sequels, and other future films in the works, such as rumoured Black Cat, Silver Sable, and Kraven The Hunter.

Disney's move to take 50% stake in Sony's Spider-Man franchise looks to be an attempt to eventually steal the Spider-Man property without buying the rights from Sony. It is well in Sony's right to turn down an unfair, controlling, take-over deal. In saying that, I do think Marvel should see a higher cut than their current 5% first-dollar gross. I would argue 10% total Box Office earnings is plenty, and fair. Sony did bring Far From Home forward to a Tuesday, where Box Office earnings are starting to rise; which gave Disney higher earnings.

Sony head, Tom Rothman and Sony CEO Tony Vinciquerra, offered Disney alternate configurations in which got rejected. Fleming's Source (most likely Sony), stated Disney wasn't interested in continuing its current arrangement where Marvel receives around 5% of First-Dollar Gross. Though earlier reports from WSJ on June 30, 2017, from "people with knowledge of the arrangement" mention: "No money changed hands under the deal. The only tweak to the prior arrangement was that in exchange for its producing services, Marvel gets to reduce the $35 million it would owe on 'Homecoming' if the movie grosses more than $750 million" [3].

While the attempt by Marvel Studios to negotiate higher returns for their input is understandable - Sony held the lead creative role, distributing, directing, financing, marketing, and mostly writing [4]. Kevin Feige is one of Sony's Creative Executives for the Spider-Man films [5] and unlike those, he had more influence over the 'M.C.U.' Spider-Man films under Sony's control. Feige most likely helped with the outline, as well as making sure the film operated within his guidelines and vision.

Lead Up To Current Spider-Man Licensing Agreement


To breakdown this down further, we are going to have to recount some old information.


With the crash of the comic industry, Marvel Entertainment Group took a considerable blow, filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 1996. Toy Biz bought Marvel Entertainment Group in 1997 ending its bankruptcy, forming a new corporation, Marvel Enterprises. Marvel went through multiple reorganizations, with Toy Biz owners, Ike Perlmutter and Avi Arad selling off Marvel character film rights for quick influxes of cash.

In 1998 Sony Pictures struck a $7 million deal for the Spider-Man rights giving Marvel Enterprises 5% film revenue and the two companies split revenue from related Spider-Man merchandise. And on September 15, 2011, Marvel renegotiated the Spider-Man license agreement. Marvel gave up its 5% of film revenue, as well as making a one-time payment of $175 million and up to $35 million for each future film for Sony's merchandising share
[6].

What The Sony Leaked Emails Shine Light On


According to Sony leaked emails, Rachel O'Connor had been in off the books talks with the Russo's about Spider-Man joining the 'M.C.U.' [7]. O'Connor spoke to Amy Pascal, in which she reached out on October 15, 2014, for a meeting with Joe [8]. Amy Pascal officially met with Kevin Feige on October 30, 2014; emails later that night between Sony Pictures Entertainment President Doug Belgrad and Co-Chairman Amy Pascal, confirm Feige's proposition. The arrangement was Sony's trilogy, and for Marvel Studios, Captain America: Civil War and two Avengers films [9]. In 2015, the Russo brothers confirmed they were in a position to reconcile the two companies [10].

The Disney and Sony deal, partially brokered through the Russo brothers was for five Spider-Man related films; three cameo appearances and two solo films; while Sony retains "creative control, marketing, and distribution" [9] over the solo movies, with Kevin Feige and Amy Pascal co-producing. Sony's planned trilogy from the emails didn't make it to the Disney contract, but as per the Far From Home end-credit-scene, there were plans. Nearing the end of this contract, Disney and Sony would need to renegotiate for a new deal. Tom Holland was locked in a six-movie contract under Sony [11] which Holland would still owe Sony a film and potential to crossover with the Venom-Verse if Disney negotiations ever broke down.

In an email from October 22, 2014, Drew Shearer mentions, "if we do this, it should be a two-picture 'crossover' arrangement. They produce Captain America/Avengers with Spider-Man appearing, and we own at least 25% of the film under a co-financing arrangement. [Any] Marvel character(s) [that] appear in our next Spider-Man movie, and they own 25% under a co-financing arrangement." Conflicting reports from Variety suggest Marvel and Sony wouldn't receive a cut from eaches films in 2015 [12], and a recent one that regurgitates information from Flemings Deadline report [13].


Official Statements


Over the last two weeks, only a few official statements have released. On August 21, 2019, Sony Pictures Entertainment gave their official reply on the matter with the following:


Sony's official statement is very diplomatic, not laying blame at anyone's feet. They frame it as Kevin Feige is too busy doing great things at Marvel Studios for him to have time to work on IP they do not own. The statement may be misleading but shines Feige in a somewhat good light still. He organized all of Phase four before Endgame even hit the screens. It's an understatement that he would be too busy, and Feige is a huge Spider-Man fan, and I am sure he would have made time for it.
The professionalism in Sony's statement doesn't slander one side or the other; it allows the studio potential to one day work with Marvel Studios again. Amy Pascal has stated many times she loves Kevin and wants to continue working with him. When the potential split of the companies is brought up, she says: "I think about crying," while elaborating more on their past [15].

And on August 26, 2019, Kevin  Feige and Tom Holland were interviewed by People in conjunction with Entertainment Weekly at the D23 Expo. Kevin Feige had the following to say:
"It was a dream I never thought would happen. It was never meant to last forever - we knew there was a finite amount of time we would be able to do this, and we told the story we wanted to tell." [16]
Tom Holland reaffirms Sony is still moving forward with his incarnation of the character saying:
"Basically, we have made five great movies. It's been five amazing years - I've had the time of my life. Who knows what the future holds. All I know is I'm going to continue playing Spider-Man - having the time of my life - and it's going to be so fun however we choose to do it. The future for Spider-Man will be different, but it will be equally as awesome and amazing, and we will find new ways to make it even cooler somehow." [16]

My Thoughts


The Disney/Sony deal all comes down to greed. Disney being greedy wants more money for Sony's Spider-Man films, as much control over Spider-Man as possible, and to get out of their current arrangement.

While Sony has had missteps with the Spider-Man franchise, the 'M.C.U.' Spider-man is a contractual shadow of his comic counterpart. The most accurate representation of Spider-Man lies with Sony, If they creatively tried. The proof they can make good Spider-Man films is Into The Spider-Verse - that was one of my favourites - it is my favourite Spider-Man movie. And internally at Sony, Venom proved the company can produce Spider-Man films without the aid of Marvel Studios. Thanks to the newfound reinvigoration of the Spider-Man IP through Marvel Studios at Sony's financial low point. In no way was Venom an outstanding Box Office success, coming in just under Spider-Man 3 and Homecoming. But Venom coming in just shy of Spider-Man 3 is enough incentive for Sony to go back to their old ways to start the cycle over again. Sony did put themselves in the hard spot with the corporate Amazing Spider-Man franchise and firing of Anderew Garfield on Amazing Spider-Man 2 by Kaz Hirai. Either way, rebooting or recasting would leave a sour taste in peoples mouths; Sony had no choice but to sign a deal with Marvel Studios.

As I do defend Sony in the Disney/Sony split, it does not mean I think they are perfect - at least Kevin Feige went to the set, unlike any Amy Pascal or any other high Sony figures. Sony does misunderstand why things are successful and learn the wrong lessons, as can be seen by Amy Pascal's interviews talking about the 'M.C.U.' and Venom. Amy talks about how she likes that each film in the 'M.C.U.' feels like a chapter you HAVE to see and that its something Sony would want to emulate. In this same interview, Amy spins Venom is in the 'M.C.U.' when it is not. Amy tried to manipulate Spider-Man fans into seeing Venom to ensure its Box Office success. Disney and Sony's rights sharing agreement did not affect the previous contract Sony had with Marvel. For Sony to retain the Spider-Man IP, a film (outside the 'M.C.U.') had to be in development within three years and nine months of the last films release.

Let me know what you think down below or on Twitter @AfterHoursMedYT

Monday, July 22, 2019

ALL THE DOCTOR STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS DETAILS WE KNOW


We finally have an announcement about the Doctor Strange sequel from SDCC 2019 from the Marvel Studios panel. Kevin Feige started It off by saying, "just because Quinten Beck makes up lies about the multiverse doesn't mean It Isn't real."

Doctor Strange has a rich history of characters with a lot to explore. I am over the moon to hear the announcement of the Doctor Strange sequel Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness hitting cinemas May 7, 2021.

Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness Is the coolest movie title I have ever heard - It sounds like It was ripped straight from the cover of a comic book!

Director Scott Derickson explained what excites him about the character of Doctor Strange and what he wants to do for the sequel.

"What excites me about Doctor Strange Is, what made him great In the comics, that he doesn't fight villains from this Earth or even this universe, but from the multiverse and other dimensions. So, you get into all kinds of psychedelic weirdness, which this movie is going to," Derickson said. "But when I came and talked to Kevin about doing a sequel, I said 'I don't want to do just another sequel to do a sequel;' If I'm going to do it, It has to go the territory that drew me into the Doctor Strange comics In the first place - which Is how they dipped Into the gothic, and the horror, and the horrific. And we are going to make the first scary MCU film."

That sounds amazing to me. Steve Ditko explored lots of exciting and Interesting things that would create brilliant visuals for a very visually exciting movie.

Derickson mentions the film going Into horror aspects and being "the first scary MCU film." Kevin Feige follows this up when someone In the crowed yells about It being R-rated, In which Feige smacks It down Instantly saying, "No, Its PG - you're gonna like it." It's expected for Feige to reply It's PG; Marvel Studios keep their films open to all demographics, to maximize Box Office earnings.

In Australia, every Marvel Studios film, besides the Antman's have been M, Instead of PG, which shouldn't be too limiting for a scary Doctor Strange film. The likes of Coraline, Monster House, The Nightmare Before Christmas are all PG and creepy, maybe scary In some ways In their own right. A more close match may be the Trench scene from James Wann's Aquaman.

In many Interviews, C. Robert Cargill and Scott Derickson have spoken about IncludIng Nightmare In the first film, but It proved difficult In an already exposition-heavy film to get across the idea of the Dream Dimension as another dimension.


"Nightmare will be the villain." C. Robert Cargill told Movie Webb In an Interview, "I have a feeling that whatever Nightmare is involved with, Baron Mordo, being somebody who considers himself the defender of natural law will have something to do with it."

Continuing about Mordo's arc, Cargill explains:

"For those of you who have ever read the comics, you know that Baron Mordo has a very particular arc, and that's something we discussed with Chiwetel while working on the first movie. And part of the reason Chiwetel wanted to play Mordo was because he has a definitive ending as a character and it's such a fascinating ending. And I do know that whether we're attached or not, that Marvel plans on working towards that ending and fully realizing Mordo as more than just a cardboard cutout villain, but actually taking him to kind of Loki levels of awesomeness. That's the goal with him."

Kevin Feige moves the presentation forward with: "When you have a strong Sourcerour, It also helps when you have a strong Witch. And the Scarlet Witch Is appearing In this movie alongside her." I'm not sure If Kevin just screwed up his words here or used some clever wordplay to Indicate Clea Is In the film. He said it helps to have a strong witch and Scarlet Witch Is appearing alongside her. Clea is considered a sorceress, but In the MCU she could be called a witch.


Feige then followed up with: "The events you will see Wanda go through In the WandaVision epic-series will be reflected and tied directly Into Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness." WandaVision being tied directly Into Doctor Strange could hint Nightmare has an Involvement In the show. If that is true, It could explain Wanda and Vision In the 50s, or he means the character she evolves to (becoming the Scarlet Witch) Is a big part of the Doctor Strange film.

Let me know what you think down below or on Twitter @AfterHoursMedYT

Saturday, June 8, 2019

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 3 RUMOUR DETAILS AND RELEASE DATE


James Gunn's eagerly awaited Guardians third movie gets some rumoured details as well as a potential release date. Gunn will begin production of Guardians' third film after 'The Suicide Squad' has finished post-production and press tours. Gunn's Suicide Squad film will release on August 6, 2021.

Rumour has it Rockets creator will be the High Evolutionary, as well as Rocket getting a love interest that Vol. 1 teased - Lylla. Drax will find out his daughter Moondragon is, actually, still alive. As well as Nebula and Quill will become closer friends throughout the film.

As for the release date, with the official release date of 'The Suicide Squad,' we can figure out Guardians Vol. 3 release date. Marvel Studio usually are concise when filming with four months of production and six months of post-production (ten months).

Disney has also released its film schedule with only 4 Marvel release dates after The Suicide Squad's release - November 5, 2021; February 18, 2022; May 6, 2022; July 22, 2022.

With Marvel Studios' usual ten months to complete a film, production could start as early as September, which would bring it to June - one month shy of the May release date, so it most likely would be the July release date.

Gunn will likely spend this time tweaking the script or setting up pre-production to start filming In October for the July 22, 2022 release date.

Edit:

After all the information presented from D-23 - all the new reveals put my guesswork to shame quite quickly. I previously guessed Gunn could start work on Guardians Vol. 3 around October ahead of a July 22, 2022 release date - but Captain Marvel 2 ended up taking that spot.

On Gunn's Instagram and Twitter, he has talked about script revisions for Guardians Vol. 3 during the quarantine period, as well as calling out false rumours about the films "confirmed" start dates, as many have tried claiming.

I'm just adding to the number of unconfirmed start dates - but at least I always admit to guessing!

Another rumour recently broke that Marvel Studios has eight new release dates which would be Phase Five - February 18, 2022; May 6, 2022; July 29, 2022; October 7, 2022; February 17, 2023; May 5, 2023; July 28, 2023; and November 3, 2023. So, pick one and hope!